Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Compassionate communication: the end of conflicts and unhappiness

“We are accustomed to thinking about what is wrong with other people when our needs are not being fulfilled. Most of us grew up speaking a language that encourages us to label, compare, demand and pronounce judgements rather than to be aware of what we are feeling and needing. If we had been raised speaking a language that facilitate compassion, we would have learned to articulate our needs and values directly rather than to insinuate wrongness when they have not been met. From the moment people begin talking about what they need rather than what is wrong with one another, the possibility of finding ways to meet everybody's needs is greatly increased.”

When it comes to expressing our feelings and needs, we may struggle to find a way to express them politely and courageously at the same time, therefore we may either act passively and suppress our feeling and needs or burst out in anger and aggression. This post is a concise summary (containing excerpts) from the book: Non-violent communication by Marshall Rosenberg. It shows you a technique how to communicate with yourself and others with compassion (=understanding, tolerance, consideration, benevolence), and how to considerately and effectively express your feelings and needs.




The main principle of compassionate communication and emotional liberation is: “stating clearly what we need in a way that communicates we are equally concerned that needs of others be fulfilled”.

"
When someone gives us a negative message we don't like (e.g.”you are the most selfish person I've ever met”, “it is your fault”, “you make me angry”, etc.), we have 2 harmful options and 2 fruitful options as to how to receive it:

😦 Option #1. Blaming ourself
We accept the other person's judgement and blame ourself (e.g. "you are right, I should have been more sensitive"). We choose this option at a great cost to our self-esteem, for it inclines us toward feelings of guilt, shame and depression
We are trained to be other-directed ("what is it that others think right for me to say and do?") rather than to be in contact with ourself. If we don't value our needs, others may not either.

Respond to the needs of others out of compassion, never out of fear, guilt or shame!! ✔
Distinguish between giving from the heart and being motivated by guilt. The basic mechanism of motivating by guilt is to attribute the responsibility for one's own feelings to others. Feeling responsible for the feelings of others can easily be mistaken for positive caring (e.g. "it hurts mammy when you get poor grades in school").
Make choices motivated purely by desire to contribute to life rather than out of fear, guilt, shame, duty, or obligation.

😠 Option #2. Blaming others:
We are likely to feel anger when we choose this option (e.g. "you make me angry, you disappoint me”, etc.). We make moralistic judgements implying wrongness or badness on the part of people who dont act in harmony with our values (e.g."the problem with you is that you are...selfish, lazy, prejudiced"). Our attention is focused on classifying, analysing and determining levels of wrongness rather than on what we and others need and not getting. When we judge others (“who is what”,“who deserves what"), we contribute to violence.

People do not hear our pain as soon as they think they have done something wrong. When people hear anything that sounds like criticism, they tend to invest their energy in self-defense or counterattack (e.g. “you have no right to say that”, “you are who is selfish not me").

Blame, insults, put-downs, labels, criticism, comparisons, diagnoses are all forms of judgement. These are tragic expressions of our own values and needs, because we increase defensiveness and resistance and we will not get what we want, or if they do agree to act in harmony with our values because they concur with our analysis of their wrongness, they will likely do so out of fear, guilt, or shame. 
We all pay dearly because sooner or later we will experience the consequences of diminished goodwill on the part of those who comply with our values out of a sense of either external or internal coercion. They also pay emotionally, for they are likely to feel resentment and decreased self-esteem when they respond to us out of fear guilt or shame, and associate us in their minds with any of those feelings, we decrease the likelihood of their responding compassionately to our needs and values in the future.

Realize that what other people say or do is never the cause how you feel. Our feelings result from how we choose to receive what others say and do, as well as our particular needs and expectations in that moment. What others do may be the stimulus of our feelings but not the cause. The cause of anger lies in our thinking that is disconnected from needs. Divorce the other person for any responsibility for your anger. 
List the judgements that float most frequently in your head by using the cue, "i don't like people who are...", and then ask yourself "when i make that judgement of a person, what am i needing and not getting?", this way you can train yourself to frame your thinking in terms of unmet needs rather then in terms of judgements of other people. At the core of all anger is a need that is not being fulfilled.


☺ Option #3. Sensing our own feelings and needs, and expressing them: ✔
When our needs are not being fulfilled, we express what we are observing, feeling and needing with a specific request (we ask for actions that might fulfill our needs). 
For instance, “I feel frustrated, when I see that you spent the weekends in the last three months without me because I need/would like to spend more time with you, so would you be willing to spend at least one whole day together with me per week?”, or “I feel angry when I see dirty clothes around, because I need harmony and peace when I am at home, so would you be willing to remove your clothes from the floor”, etc.)

step1. OBSERVATION:
We observe what is actually happening in a situation: what are we observing others saying and doing that we either like or do not like? The trick is to articulate it without introducing any judgement or evaluation.

Clearly observe what we are seeing hearing or touching that is affecting our sense of well-being without mixing in any evaluation, or passing judgement on either the person or the behavior. When we combine observation with evaluation, people apt to hear criticism. (Jiddu Krishnamurti: "observing without evaluating is the highest form of human intelligence")

Indicate if an evaluation is being made !! (e.g. instead of saying "you are too generous”, rather say this “when i see you give all your money to others i think you are being too generous")
Avoid:
 ¤ Using words with evaluative connotations (e.g. lazy, ugly, procrastinate, etc.)
¤ Implication that your inferences/opinions about another person's thoughts, feelings intentions or desires are the only ones possible (e.g. "he won't make it”, say this rather: “i don't think he will make it")
¤ Confusion of predictions with certainty (e.g. "if you don't exercise, then you will be unhealthy", say this rather: “i am afraid, you will be unhealthy if you...”)

step2. FEELINGS:
We state how we feel when we observe others action: are we hurt, scared, joyful amused, irritated?


Distinguish feelings from thoughts: what we feel, and what we think we are (e.g. "I feel as if/i feel that/i feel like a failure" is a thought, not a feeling).
Distinguish what we feel and how we think others react or behave toward us (e.g. "I feel unimportant, misunderstood, ignored" this is more of an interpretation of the actions of others).

Build a vocabulary for feelings:


step3. NEEDS:
We say what needs of ours are connected to the feelings.

We accept responsibility rather than blame others for our feelings by acknowledging our own needs, desires, expectations, hope, values, or thoughts behind our feeling. (e.g. “I feel angry when I see dirty clothes around, because I need peace and harmony when I am at home”)

Speech patterns that mask accountability for our feelings:
¤ Statements that use only the actions of others (e.g. "when you dont call me  on my birthday, I feel hurt");
¤ “Because you” expression (e.g."i feel ....because you....” , say this rather: “I feel because I ......”);
¤ Impersonal pronoun (e.g. "it/that bugs me").

[ Basic human needs:
Physical nurturance: air, food, water, shelter, protection, movement/exercise, rest, touch, sexual expression;
Interdependence: acceptance, appreciation, closeness, community, consideration, empathy, honesty, love; reassurance, respect, support, trust, understanding, warmth;
Autonomy: to choose one's dreams, goals and values, and one's path to fulfill them;
Integrity: authenticity, creativity, meaning, self-worth;
Celebration: to celebrate dreams fulfilled and life, and mourn over losses;
Play: fun, laughter;
Spiritual communion: beauty, harmony, inspiration, order, peace. ]

Step4. REQUEST:
What we are wanting from the other person that would enrich our life or make life more wonderful for us.

The clearer we are what we want back from the other person, the more likely it is that our needs will be met, we get what we want. Making request in a clear, positive, concrete action language reveals what we really want, whereas vague language contributes to internal confusion.

Use positive language (e.g. "I want....” vs. “I dont want")
Avoid vague, abstract, ambiguous phrasing (e.g. I need help, love, freedom, etc.) and word your request in the form of concrete actions that others can undertake.

Define your objective when you make a request: if your objective is only to change people and their behavior or to get your way regardless of what they want, then compassionate communication is not an appropriate tool. It is your tool if your objective is a relationship based on honesty and empathy, and you want others change and respond only if they choose to do so willingly and compassionately.
   
Requests unaccompanied by the speaker's feelings and needs may sound like a demand. A demand explicitly or implicitly threatens listeners with blame or punishment if they fail to comply. Requests are received as demands when others believe they will be blamed or punished if they do not comply, and they see two options: submission or rebellion.
How to tell if it is a demand or a request: Observe what the speaker does if the request is not complied with. It is a demand if the speaker then criticizes or judges, or lays a guilt-trip. It is a request if the speaker then shows empathy toward the other person's needs ("so, you feel tired and need a little rest? "). 
Choosing to request rather then demand does not mean we give up when someone says 'no' to our request, it does mean we don't engage in persuasion until we have empathised with what is preventing the other person from saying yes.

The more we interpret noncompliance as rejection (e.g. "if you loved me, you would do it"), the more likely our requests will be heard as demands, this leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy, for the more people hear demands, the less they enjoy being around us. We can help others trust that we are requesting, not demanding, by indicating that we would only want the person to comply if he/she can do so willingly ("would you be willing to... vs. i would like you to do....")
To the degree that people in life have been blamed, punished, or urged to feel guilty for not doing what others have requested, the more likely they are to carry this baggage to every subsequent relationship and hear a demand in a request. In this case, emphasize  that they are free to choose (e.g. “how can i let you know what i am wanting from you so it doesn't sound like i dont care about what you would like/want?").

The message we send is not always the message that is received. Ask the listener for reflection, indicate that it is because you want to be sure that you expressed yourself clearly (e.g. "could you tell me what you just heard me say, I want to make sure i have expressed myself clearly", "do you understand what i mean?")
   
After we express ourself vulnerably, we often want to know the other person's reaction to what we have said. We can take three directions:
¤ What the listener is feeling ("how you feel about what i have just said?")
¤ What the listener is thinking, specify which thoughts you would like to receive ("what do you think would make my plan successful?")
¤ Whether the listener would be willing to take a particular action ("I would like you to tell me if you would be willing to ..")   


Quick guide to expressing anger:
1.Stop and do nothing except to breathe.
We refrain from any move to blame or punish the other person. Give yourself the empathy for the hurt, fear or rage that is stirring inside you.
2.Identify your judgemental thoughts  
(e.g. "it is unfair/wrong to act like that")
3.Connect with your needs behind those thoughts (here we may empathise with the other person first and hear his pain so that they will be better able to hear us when we express our feelings and unmet needs)
4.Express your feelings and unmet needs
(e.g. "i am angry because I am needing....; and avoid this: “I am angry becuse You...”).


Expressing appreciation:
Notice when you say “you are generous, nice, etc.”, words denoting ability, you are evaluating the other person, in other words, you make judgements, although positive ones. 
Rather, express the action the other person contributed to your well-being, and your feelings and needs. (e.g. “thank you for this wonderful book, I have been searching for a good book on this topic so long, you made my day by giving me this.”). 
If you are the receiver, thank for it regardless your agreeing with it or not, receive appreciation gracefully, without feelings of superiority of false humility. 


☺ Option #4. Sensing other's feelings and needs: ✔
Receive the same four pieces of information from others: sense what they are observing, feeling, needing and then discover what would enrich their lives by receiving their request.

Behind intimidating messages are simply people appealing to us to meet their needs. People who seem like monsters are simply human beings whose language and behavior sometimes keep us from seeing their humanness. No matter what words people use to express themself, we listen for their observations, feelings and needs, and what they are requesting.

In relating to others, empathy occurs only when we have successfully shed all preconceived ideas and judgements about them. Empty your mind and  listen actively to others with your whole being. Empathy requires focusing full attention on the other person's message and what they are experiencing.

We give to others the time and space they need to express themselves fully and to feel understood. Allow others the opportunity to fully express themselves before turning your attention to solutions or requests for relief. When we proceed to quickly to what other people might be requesting, we may not convey our genuine interest in their feelings and needs, and they may get the impression that we are in a hurry to either be free of them or to fix their problem. It is often frustrating for someone needing empathy to have us assume that they want reassurance or fix-it advice.

Communication mistakes:
¤ advising ("i think you should..", "how come you didn't...")
¤ educating ("this could turn into a useful experience if you...")
¤ consoling ("it wasn't your fault, you did the best you could")
¤ story-telling ("that reminds me of the time..")
¤ one-upping (e.g. "that is nothing, wait till you hear what happened to me")
¤ shutting down (e.g. "cheer up, dont feel so bad")
¤ sympathizing (e.g. "oh, you poor thing..")
¤ interrogating (e.g. "when did this begin?")
¤ explaining (e.g. "i would have called but")
¤ correcting (e.g. "that's not how it happened")
   
When they fully expressed themselves, then paraphrase what you heard. Guess about other's feelings and needs (e.g. "are u feeling hurt because you need more consideration for your preferences?"). Paraphrasing will confirm for the speaker if we accurately received the message, or the speaker has the opportunity to correct us. Reflecting the message also offers them time to reflect on what they have said and an opportunity to touch deeper levels of themselves. When we paraphrase, the tone of voice we use is highly important. When they hear themselves reflected back, people are likely to be sensitive to the slightest hint of criticism or sarcasm.

Paraphrasing take the form of questions, focusing on:
¤ What others are observing (e.g. "are you reacting to how many evenings i was gone last week?");
¤ How others are feeling and the needs generating their feelings (e.g. "are you feeling hurt because you need/would like more appreciation for your...?");
¤ What others are requesting (e.g."are you wanting me to tell you my reasons for...").

People feel safer if we first reveal our feelings and needs within ourself that are generating the question (e.g. "i am frustrated because i would like to be clearer about what you are referring to", versus "what did i do?").

We know the speaker has received adequate empathy when: we sense a release of tension in our own body, or the speaker will stop talking. If we are uncertain, ask ("is there more that you wanted to say?").

If we find ourselves unable or unwilling to empathise despite our efforts, it is usually a sign that we are too starved for empathy. Provide ourself with empathy by listening to what is going on in ourselves with full presence and attention until we experience a natural release of energy that then enables us to be present with the other person. If however, the other party is also experiencing such intensity of feelings that they can neither hear us nor leave us alone, it is better to physically remove ourselves from the situation.
"

"Metta" loving kindness meditation, which emphasize compassion, can strenghten the basis of non-violent communication. Practitioners train in by contemplating and visualizing the suffering and then wishing the freedom from that suffering for all sentient beings, while they are repeating this utterance: “May you be free from suffering. May you experience joy and ease.” Here you can learn the basics of Metta loving kindness meditation:
!!! NEXT STEP of self-development >




Wednesday, March 14, 2018

How to get rid of disliked traits and habits: The science of conditioning



You probaly already know a lot of techniques how to control and motivate yourself and how to influence others. The mechanisms of these processes have been rigorously studied in the last hundred years through experimental psychology. Read and learn how you can exploit this knowledge and use it to your advantage.

A quick test to start. How were you reinforced as a kid and how do you reinforce your child?

Choise 1. Do you give attention and praise your children when they accomplish things (e.g. “nice drawing”, “see, your effort was  very productive”, etc.), and in addition, you do not overly criticize, belittle and attack them when they make mistakes (e.g. “you are a bad kid” “you cannot even tie your shoe”, “you will end up in jail one day”, etc.)?

Choise 2. Do you give attention mostly when they get injured, hurt and miserable, and do not give much attention when everything is going well?

Choise 3. Do you give attention only when they make trouble or make mistakes?

Attention = Reinforcement,
thus attention strengthen the behavior that preceeds it.
In the first scenario of the above test, you reinforce achievements and so you raise high achievers. In the second scenario, your child learn that self-pity is a useful way to get attention, love and sympathy. However, later she/he has to realize that it is not a attractive trait in adulthood. In the third case, mischief-makers cause difficulties to others and themself and may also end up in jail, indeed. Of course, the end result is much more complicated since many factors affect a child during development.

 People' overt behavior are configured through classical (pavlovian)  and operant conditioning, and also via modelling (observing the behavior of others).
Thoughts (= actions of the mind) are acquired and maintained in much the same manner as overt behavior, thus can be modified by any type of reinforcement or punishment that seems to have a contingent connection to them.

Our past experiences (including early childhood experiences) determine our present behavior, speech and thinking. Behaviors that received strong reinforcement for many years during childhood tend to be unchanged and hard to stop even years later when environmetal conditions change.

 Pavlovian conditioning
(Ivan Pavlov experiments with dogs, 1890s) occurs when some neutral stimulus (e.g. sight of a bee) is so closely associated with an existing reflex (e.g. sting causes pain and aversion) that it takes on the power to elicit the reflexive response (e.g. sight of a bee elicits aversion).

[A reflex consists of a stimulus-response sequence, in which some stimulus (unconditioned stimulus= no need to learn) elicits a biological based response including physical and emotional response, either pleasurable or painful e.g. bee sting elicits pain and aversion, bad food elicits vomiting and aversion, good food elicit salivation and pleasure, painful blows elicit increased heart rate and fear, gentle touch elicits tranquillity.]
(suggested reading: Behavior principles in everyday life by John D. and Janice I. Baldwin)

Cues that most reliable precede and predict the onset of a relfex are the stimuli that become conditioned/learnt stimuli. If you want to better understand your feelings and emotions, play closer attention to the stimuli that precede and predicts them.
Conditioned reflexes can lose power and disappear over time (extinction), if the conditioned stimulus appears without being followed by the unconditioned stimulus and reflex  („time heals old wounds”). Extinction cannot take place if the person avoids contacts with a conditioned stimuli that would neutralize it (e.g. after an accident the person avoids driving). Thus, conditioned fears and anxieties are less likely to extinguish naturally than are conditioned pleasures. Therapeutic extinctions involves having a person confront a fear-inducing conditioned stimulus in a safe environment that is free of aversive stimuli.

The pavlovian mechanism can be exploited to influence your own or others' mental states. Setting up environmental cues (e.g. image, word, imaginary, etc.), you can elicit a particular feeling in yourself or others (e.g. if you want to induce high performance put a picture of a race-winning athlete, if you want to facilitate deep thinking put a picture of Roden's thinker, or ask women's phone number in front of a flower shop that elicit romantic feelings). (suggested reading: Pre-suasion by Robert Cialdini)

You can also create new associations deliberately (a.k.a. anchoring), and link together a chosen signal with a desired mental state (e.g. confidence, cheerfulness), and use this anchor cue signal (e.g. physical signal, gesture, a specific smell, music, symbol, color, etc.), when you wish to call up that emotion instantly.
The first step is to create the link between the anchor and the desired emotion. Visualize a past experience and re-live it many times (you need to feel permeated by the emotion) and at the pick apply the choosen anchor (e.g. smell, physical signal, etc.). For  instance, press together thumb and index finger or clap together your palms while you are at the pick of feeling confident, or smile while you are at the pick experience of cheerfulness, or get a sniff of a smell). Repeat the process many times to create the link successfully. Later you can call up the feeling instantly with applying the anchor (e.g. pressing together the fingers, clapping together your palms, or smiling).

 Operant conditioning
 (Edward Thorndike experiments with cats 1898, B.F. Skinner experiments with rats and pigeons, 1938) occurs when an operant (action) is followed by either reinforcement
(positive reinforcement= receiving a reward, or negative reinforcement= escaping or avoiding a bad experience)
 or punishment (positive punishment= addition of aversive stimulus, negative punishment= substraction of award), thus it strengthen or suppress that behavior. Pavlovian conditioning often occurs as a natural by-product of operant conditioning, thus performing a behavior elicit emotional responses.

It can be used to induce desired emotions „fake it until you make it”, for instance, to feel happier, smile long enough and eventually it induces a feeling of happiness; or in order to boost your self-esteem and be more confident, strike expansive poses (e.g. sit erect with hands behind the head, or stand with extended hands above your head looking upon the sky).


How parents teach wicked or useless behavior?

Some children learn to be polite early in life, if this behaviour is associated with generous levels of reinforcement over long periods of time, and later these kids feel natural to be kind to others.
The same goes for undesirable behaviors, for instance many people retain „childish behaviors”, such as whining, pouting, crying, doing self-pity, being a nuisance in adulthood. Although childish behaviors often cause parents to give their child abundant social attention and social reinforcers, immature behavior often prevents people from developing high quality relationships in their adulthood.

Children who receive frequent noncontingent reinforcement (that is receiving free rewards without doing anything that takes effort) can acquire learned laziness. Children who are showered with toys, attention, and treats by doting parents often become „spoiled”, and  develop passivity, apathy, and lack of motivation.

In contrast, people who receive frequent noncontingent punishment (that is no relationship between the person's behavior and the punishment) can develop learned helplessness involving passivity, apathy, and depression. Children raised in highly abusive homes, when parents take out their anger on the children, and there is not much they can do to avoid the physical and verbal abuse, gradually, attempts to avoid punishment extinguish, and the victims learn to accept the pain passively. Once people developed learned helplessness, they often learn to  tolerate abuses even when they could avoid it.


How parents teach negative thinking?

Thoughts (action of the mind) are acquired and maintained in much the same manner as overt behavior, thus can be modified by any type of reinforcement or punishment that seems to have a contingent connection to them.
If a person has often experienced trauma, failure, disappointment, or other punishers after optimistically planning for future events, the punishment can supress optimistic thinking.
Similarly, if negative thoughts and worries are reinforced (e.g. receiving sympathy), that person end up worrying all the time. Also, the production of creative thoughts can be increased through reinforcement by rewarding yourself with positive self-comments (e.g. „that was wonderful”) after noticing each clever idea.

Some children learn to escape social punishment by being self-critical and self-punitive because their behavior often reduces the likelihood that other people will punish their transgressions. (negative reinforcement=escaping a bad experience). Because escape and avoidance behavior can be very resistant to extinction, these individuals may continue to engage in self-punishing thoughts long after there is any reason to do so.

Thoughts can become conditioned stimuli through pavlovian conditioning, that can elicit conditioned responses including pleasurable or painful emotions (e.g. daydreaming or thinking of a loved one elicit pleasure; thinking of an embarrasing experience elicit discomfort).
 If negative thoughts and worries elicit aversive responses, why do some people end up worrying all the time? There are several reinforcers that outweight the pain of the negative thoughts such as escaping from major problems (e.g. worrying about an exam, one plan ahead with studying hard), thus worry is a type of problem-solving behavior. Social reinforcement (e.g. receiving sympathy- positive social reinforcement) also can strengthen the habits of worrying. And finally, once these reinforcements causes a person to begin worrying, they are further reinforced by sensory stimulation (a lesser-known reinforcer) generating dozens of novel worries  resulting in a long chain of thoughts.

Thoughts condition other thoughts through pavlovian conditioning, thus for instance, thoughts that precede and predict positive thoughts also become increasingly pleasurable (e.g. when you fall in love, you find that many of the things that your loved one likes also becomes more appealing to you).
Similarly, thoughts that precede and predict negative thoughts also become increasingly painful (e.g. thoughts about nuclear power elicit aversive feelings after bad experience). People who worry a great deal may inadvertently condition a large-number of once-neutral thoughts into fear eliciting conditioned stimuli (e.g. after a person has learned to be afraid of dying in an airplane accident, while worrying about the details, this person may happen to think about driving and imagine there could be a car accident, and  then that person may become worrying about other kinds of travel, and eventually end up developing agoraphobia.



How to  prevent the plague of irrational thoughts and worry?

Developing adequate reasoning skills is a good way to prevent the plague of irrational thoughts and fears that magnify problems. Rational decision method involves steps:

1. List as many alternative choices as feasible in a choice situation;

2. List the immediate and long-term consequences, pros (+) and cons (-) (positive and negative thoughts that comes to your mind) of each choice;

3. Then honestly evaluating all the pros and cons of each alternative, without biases.

When people do not follow the guidelines, they often focus on the immediate consequences of the most conspicuous choices, which narrows their range of choices, and they also may bias their selection in favor of immediate gratification rather than long-term planning. People who have not been reinforced for reasoning may find this task so effortful and unpleasant that they skip the evaluation process and fail to reach a well-reasoned decision.

In addition, developing self-control skills help to better manage your thoughts, moods, behaviors and habits (e.g. eating, exercise, politeness). Self-control involves

1. self-observation and self-descriptions (e.g. “I have extra weight”),

2. self-evaluation in terms of goals (e.g. “my physical fitness needs to be improved”),

3. goal-oriented self-instruction (e.g. “I start working out 3 times a week”), and

4. reinforcement (e.g. beyond feeling better you may use verbal self-reinforcement also “I am awesome and glad I resolved my fitness issues”).



Related posts:
How to start yoga posture training at home

3 relaxing meditation techniques from three traditions (Hindu, Theravadin Buddhist, Japanese Zen)

Compassionate communication: the end of conflicts and unhappiness